Tristan Schoolkate vs Yibing Wu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Jul at 02:56 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Schoolkate vs Y. Wu

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Schoolkate 1 - 0 Wu
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tristan Schoolkate winning 2 and Yibing Wu winning 1. The last match between Tristan Schoolkate and Yibing Wu was at the Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos, 15-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Tristan Schoolkate getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schoolkate | 1 |
| Wu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos(07-15-25)
T. Schoolkate vs Y. Wu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $726,565 | Career Prize Money | $748,530 |
| 57.57% (213-157) | Career Total W/L | 64.19% (147-82) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 40.00% (6-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (5-5) |
T. Schoolkate vs Y. Wu Match Preview:
- Recently, Wu has won 43.85% of points on their second serve, slightly trailing Schoolkate's 44.46%. Why is this significant? Consistent second serve performance is crucial for balance in matches.
- In return games, Schoolkate has a competitive edge, winning 48.22% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Wu's 45.03%. This ability to pressure opponents on second serves could be pivotal.
- Both players exhibit comparable ability under pressure, with Schoolkate narrowly surpassing Wu in breakpoints saved, 59.74% to 59.39%.
- Looking at overall match success in the past year, Wu has a stronger winning percentage at 72.41% compared to Schoolkate's 59.52%.
- On their best surfaces, Wu excels on indoor hard courts with a striking 91% win rate, while Schoolkate performs best on grass at 68%. Does Wu's preference for indoor surfaces provide an edge in this match?
- Wu generally faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 255.62, slightly lower in rank than those faced by Schoolkate (229.73). This implies Wu's potential experience in overcoming stronger competition.
- In deciding sets, Wu is more successful, winning 67% of those situations, compared to Schoolkate’s 58%, suggesting Wu's resilience in tight scenarios.
- Analyzing breakpoint conversion, Wu also holds a decisive advantage, converting 40.28% of their opportunities over Schoolkate's 29.03%.
Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):
Wu and Schoolkate are set to clash in what promises to be a closely contested tennis match. Both players have shown consistency in their performances, but key differentiators could steer the outcome.
Wu demonstrates a superior ability to convert on breakpoint opportunities and has slightly better resilience in deciding sets. These factors could be decisive in pressure situations. Moreover, Wu's overall higher win rate over the past year and experience against stronger opponents suggest a more robust competitive edge.
Considering these performance trends and comparative strengths, Wu is poised to be the likely victor in this upcoming match, leveraging their decisive advantages under pressure and historical success rate.
Tristan Schoolkate vs Yibing Wu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Schoolkate vs Y. Wu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:1:1 | Average Match Time | 2:1:1 |
| 58% (47/81) | 1st Serve % | 58% (49/85) |
| 83% (39/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (29/49) |
| 59% (20/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (23/36) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 39% (33/85) | Return Points Win % | 27% (22/81) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Schoolkate Recent Matches Played
Y. Wu Recent Matches Played

T. Schoolkate vs Y. Wu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.57% (213/157) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.19% (147/82) |
| 54.87% (479/394) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.94% (323/207) |
| 52.11% (4457/4096) | Games Win/Loss | 53.41% (2715/2368) |
| 57.72% (142/104) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.67% (94/56) |
| 50.00% (24/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.54% (32/20) |
| 53.13% (17/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 90.91% (20/2) |
| 68.18% (30/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 2633 | Aces Total | 832 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1538 | Total Double Faults | 464 |
| 1:47:10 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 279.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 398.3 |
| 60% (15770/26209) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9355/15075) |
| 74% (11716/15770) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (6427/9355) |
| 49% (5063/10439) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (3018/5720) |
| 39% (959/2455) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (604/1442) |
| 38% (10120/26628) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5870/14950) |
| 42.11% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Masters W/L | 37.50% (6/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 40.00% (10/15) | Main Tour W/L | 55.26% (21/17) |
| 56.57% (99/76) | Challenger W/L | 70.00% (70/30) |
| 64.03% (89/50) | Futures W/L | 70.91% (39/16) |
| 57% (205/358) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (139/208) |
| 60% (6/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 51% (88/172) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (49/83) |
| 58% (70/120) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (45/71) |
| 89% (187/167) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (135/122) |
| 11% (187/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (135/13) |
| 25% (183/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (93/28) |